Public policy put in place points toward a tailwind for construction employment and manufacturing.
Aggregate hours worked
For evidence of this growth, we can look to aggregate hours worked, which is the number of employees times the number of hours worked. This proxy measure of economic activity and labor market growth allows us to compare activity in the major sectors of the economy and to compare growth rates of employment and production over time.- Service sector: As of September, activity in the service sector, which makes up 81% of aggregate hours worked in the U.S. economy, is growing at 1.4% per year. This is compared to 1.2% at the end of 2019.
- Goods-producing sector: The goods-producing sector accounts for less than 19% of total hours worked and is comprised of the manufacturing sector (11% of aggregate hours), the construction sector (nearly 7%) and the resource extraction sector (0.6%).
- Manufacturing: The manufacturing sector’s post-pandemic growth beginning in 2021 was remarkable, with firms hiring at prolific pace while investing in productivity. This comeback included a period of 4% or more in aggregate growth last year compared with the 0.9% decrease at the end of 2019. But hiring tailed off this year as new orders drifted lower and as firms girded for a recession. Manufacturing aggregate hours are now growing at a rate of only 0.2% per year.
- Construction: In the construction sector, aggregate hours are growing at 3.5% per year compared with 2.2% at the end of 2019. From 2021 through June, construction spending accounted for the greatest share of gross domestic product growth of any two-quarter period on record. According to the White House Council of Economic Advisors, GDP expanded at an annualized pace of 2.15% over that period, with .53 percentage points coming from manufacturing construction. To put this in perspective, through August manufacturing construction alone resulted in a 90% increase, or $184 billion, over year-ago levels.

Construction employment
The construction industry deserves a closer look, both as the predicate for resolving the housing shortage and for laying the groundwork for manufacturing growth. In terms of workers employed in construction, the industry has yet to recover from the dual shocks of the manufacturing recession and the pandemic shutdown. While the pre- and post-shock rates of growth appear to be close, a simple analysis suggests room to grow and little sign of that private investment is being crowded out by the government infrastructure and industrial policy programs. We are optimistic that the crowding in of public investment will serve as an incentive for risk taking around construction and serve as a magnet for prime-aged workers 25 to 54 looking for higher wages in construction and goods production.
- Residential buildings: 11.6%
- Nonresidential buildings: 11%
- Civil engineering: 14%
- Specialty trades: 63%

The reindustrialization of the U.S. economy
A paper by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in 2006 ironically found that at the time, the positive productivity effects from foreign materials sourcing were most pronounced among firms had that were already globally engaged in outsourcing. In addition, such engagements could be close to their optimum level in developed economies. The 2006 paper could not have guessed that in just a few months, the floodgates of U.S. offshoring would open wide. Read more of RSM’s insights on manufacturing and the middle market. From 2006 and through 2009, after 30 postwar years of the United States being the industrial engine of the world, the manufacturing sector would enter the final chapter of its de-industrialization. Producers would use the cover of the financial crisis and the economic downturn to take full advantage of tax avoidance strategies and the availability of cheap labor in offshore locations. It took the 37 years, between 1943 and 1980, for service-sector jobs to become twice as prevalent as goods-producing jobs. But that shift accelerated dramatically, and by 2009, service-sector jobs were five times as great as goods-producing jobs.